## Aspect 1

Grade 6/6

Museums should probably use an ID rather than the name as Key.

## Aspect 2

Grade: 6/6

## Aspect 3

Grade: 3/6

Wrong use of week entities between Museum/Storage and Location, PiecesOfArt and Sculptures/Paintings/Others as they Are 1-to-1 relationships.

## Aspect 4

Grade 0/6

N Arts should be a be able to move M times to 1 location.

Current implementation allow multiples moves on one day.

## Aspect 5

Grade: 6/6

Arity is well chosen.

## Aspect 6

Grade: 6/6

Entities are well chosen.

## Aspect 7

Grade: 5/6

Street number in storage sites should not be there as it belong to the location, and the size attribute is missing

## Aspect 8

Grade: 6/6

All relationships are well chosen.

## Aspect 9

Grade: 6/6

- Other types of art are available with "Other", but only a type can be specified, and no other information.
- One piece of art belong to only one collection.

It was pretty easy to understand those design choices as the diagram is well designed.

## Aspect 10

Grade: 6/6

## Aspect 11

Grade: 5/6

The same small mistakes have been made in the UML diagram than in the ER diagram, but the global design is still very good.

## Aspect 12

Grade: 6/6

The diagrams are consistent.

## Aspect 13

Grade: 1/6 (as requested by the teacher)

The UML diagram is easier to understand than the ER diagram because it has way less forms, and lines represents only relationships between entities and not attributes.